{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BlogPosting","headline":"Annual performance review: a step-by-step guide for managers","description":"Annual performance review: how to prepare, a six-step structure, questions to ask, phrases for tricky moments and a checklist for managers.","image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/69831bd958b44e98b770589e/6ac95b282154ca6bfb8df349_6ac95afd43a5b6f4c47cb197_annual-performance-review-method-v2.jpeg","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Mame-Mor Fall"},"articleSection":"Training","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Face Up","url":"https://face-up.fr/"}}

An annual performance review is a one-to-one meeting between a manager and a team member to take stock of the past year and prepare for the next. You look back at results, assess skills, set new objectives and listen to what the employee wants. Done well, it clarifies expectations on both sides for the next twelve months.
This guide is for the manager leading the conversation. It covers preparation, the six-step structure, the questions to ask, phrases for tricky moments and the mistakes to avoid. It ends with a checklist and a way to practise before the day itself.
The annual performance review looks at performance. It answers three questions: what was achieved, how, and what is expected next year. In France, it is not a general legal requirement. It is a company practice, sometimes set out in a collective agreement.
The professional review (entretien professionnel) is a different exercise. It is required by the French Labour Code (Code du travail) and focuses on the employee's career path: training, qualifications, progression. It must not be used to assess their work. Its frequency was changed by a recent reform, so check the current rule with your HR team. Both reviews can take place on the same day, but they remain two separate conversations, with two separate written records.
Preparation starts two to three weeks before the meeting. It involves both people: the employee should be able to prepare their own review of the year.
A good test for your examples: could a third party have observed them? “He's very committed” is an opinion. “He took over the client account in March while his colleague was away” is a fact.
The order matters. The employee speaks first, the manager second. Starting by listening stops the conversation from turning into a verdict.
The balance rule is simple: the employee should speak at least as much as you. If you notice you are delivering a monologue, ask an open question and wait for the answer.
Open questions get people talking. Closed questions confirm a specific point. Here is a starting list to adapt to your context.
The last question is often the most useful. It leaves room for whatever the template did not anticipate.
The difficult moments in an annual review are predictable. Preparing your key phrases saves you from improvising under pressure. The principle is the one behind constructive feedback: start from the facts, listen, then focus on what can change.
Do not defend your rating on principle. Ask for their evidence, then compare it with yours.
Disappointment over a pay rise, a promotion or a rating deserves to be acknowledged. Playing it down shuts the conversation.
Separate the result from the person, and look for causes before drawing conclusions.
In all three cases, the reflex is the same: ask a question, listen to the answer, then come back to the facts. If things get tense, conflict management techniques for managers help bring the pressure down.
To go further on how to assess interpersonal know-how, look at the tools available for evaluating management competencies.
Allow at least an hour, without interruptions. A review that is too short leaves little room for the employee to speak. If a topic needs more time, schedule a second conversation.
Practices vary from one company to another. Most often, the employee reads it, can add their comments, then signs to confirm they have seen it. Follow the procedure set by your HR team.
Yes, as long as they are clearly separated. The professional review focuses on the career path and must not assess the person's work. Two distinct conversations and two written records avoid any confusion.
Silence is not always a refusal. Ask a more concrete question, about a specific situation from the year. Give them time to answer, and offer to follow up on a point in writing if they prefer.
Reading a list of questions does not prepare you for the other person's reaction. An employee who disputes their rating or takes a disappointment badly tests your reflexes, not your knowledge. These interpersonal skills are built through practice, as role play on difficult management situations shows.
With Face Up, a trainer creates an annual review scenario. The persona reacts: they get defensive, go quiet, express disappointment. The manager talks to them by voice and on video. After the role play, a debrief shows which objectives were met, strengths, areas for improvement and an action plan. The manager replays the scene and tracks their progress.
To prepare your managers for their annual reviews with this kind of practice, book a demo.